ABSTRACT
@#Objective To evaluate a score system to allow stratification of complexity in degenerative mitral valve repair. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 312 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for mitral valve repair and whose preoperative echocardiography was referable in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2013. A scoring system for surgical complexity was used based mainly on the preoperative echocardiography findings. Complexity of mitral valve repair was scored as 1 to 9, and patients were categorized into 3 groups based on the score for surgical complexity: a simple group (1 point), an intermediate group (2-4 points) and a complex group (≥5 points). There were 86 males and 35 females in the simple group (n=121) with an average age of 51.6±12.6 years, 105 males and 53 females in the intermediate group (n=158) with an average age of 51.1±12.8 years and 25 males and 8 females in the complex group (n=33) with an average age of 49.3±13.0 years. Results There was significant difference in surgical complexity in different groups. In the simple, intermediate and complex groups, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 111.7±45.5 min, 117.7±40.4 min and 153.4±74.2 min (P<0.001), the mean cross-clamping time was 77.5±33.8 min, 83.2±29.9 min and 108.8±56.2 min (P<0.001), and the mean number of repair techniques utilized was 2.1±0.4, 2.4±0.6 and 2.8±0.8 (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the early and late outcomes in different groups. Conclusion It is feasible to use echocardiography to quantitatively evaluate the difficulty of mitral valvuloplasty.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To compare the in-hospital and midterm outcomes after simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods One hundred thirty-two diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease underwent one-stop HCR at Fuwai Hospital from January 2010 to January 2015. These patients were 1∶2 matched with those who underwent OPCAB using propensity score matching. Results Simultaneous HCR had less chest tube drainage (618 (420, 811) ml vs. 969 (711, 1 213)ml, P<0.001), lower transfusion rate (19.7% vs. 34.1%, P=0.026), shorter mechanical ventilation time (11.6 (8.2, 14.8) h vs. 16.0 (12.1, 18.7) h, P<0.001), and shorter stay in intensive care unit (21.5 (18.8, 42.0) h vs. 44.6 (23.7, 70.1) h, P<0.001) than OPCAB. During over median 40 months follow-up, simultaneous HCR offered similar major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate (6.8% vs 9.0%, P=0.826), but lower stroke rate (0%vs 3.0%, P=0.029), compared with OPCAB. Conclusion For selected patients with diabetes, simultaneous HCR provides a safe and effective revascularization alternative. It decreases perioperative invasiveness and incurred similar and favorable midterm outcomes with OPCAB.